Batman: Gothic - Grant Morrison & Klaus Janson

After the critically acclaimed “Arkham Asylum”, Grant Morrison would return to Batman in “Gothic”, described as a “romance in five volumes”a. The first chapter, “Man without a shadow” (published in Legends of the Dark Knight # 6, April 1990), introduces a new antagonist while focusing on the ugliest side Batman’s city: “Gotham City is hell. We are all in hell. And I am the king of hell”, shouts an angry Batman. These are no empty words. Certainly, judging by the quasi-infernal illustrations concocted by the effervescent imagination of Klaus Janson, we would have to believe that every word uttered by the Caped Crusader is absolutely true.

In these pages, the Scottish writer surprises the reader with moments of insightful characterization and authentic character development. The most unforgettable sequences take place, for example, during the conversations between Bruce Wayne and his butler, Alfred Pennyworth. Bruce stays immobile, surrounded by clocks that have all stopped exactly at the same time, the hour of the demise of his father; and when he’s interrupted by Alfred he seems much more worried and troubled than usual. We are also made privy to Bruce’s nightmares (or “daymares” as Alfred calls them), in which he sees his father, still alive but horribly disfigured, mouthless and unable to speak to his son.

For Bruce Wayne, becoming Batman is the only alternative to silence the horror that lurks in his subconscious. However, he has never faced an enemy like Whisper before. This antagonist shares little resemblance with the usual colorful villains that Batman defeats on a daily basis. This mysterious and sinister man is hunting down his former colleagues and executing them in the most painful ways he can come up. 

Whispers seems to be completely psychotic but at the same time more dangerous than any other villain Batman has fought against. He’s doing such an exemplary job by eliminating his former colleagues that Gotham's mob families are forced to ask help to the Dark Knight himself. Janson excels in a splash page that shows the sky of Gotham and the mobsters’ improvised (and inverted) bat-signal. One of the criminals explains what happened: “twenty years ago we killed him. We had to kill him before he did it again [...] We killed him and he won't stay dead”. Whisper is truly the man without a shadow.

In “The Death Ship” (Legends of the Dark Knight # 7, May 1990) we see Bruce Wayne as a vulnerable individual, plagued by recurrent nightmares that remind him of his dead parents and his traumatic past. Not even the memories of his childhood are comforting, on the contrary they represent another landscape of fear.

Try as he may, Alfred is unable to calm Bruce down after he wakes up screaming. The scars of the past cannot be healed so easily. Bruce shares with Alfred a confession about his days as a student in a private school: “it was traditional to live in fear of bullying prefects. It was traditional to be beaten and humiliated and to fight off the advances of degenerate old teachers with doctorate degrees”.

Perhaps one of the most shocking flashbacks is the one that shows Bruce Wayne being beaten violently by Winchester, the school Headmaster. This particular scene, which depicts child abuse in a very explicit manner, it's a pivotal point of the narrative as it shows that traumatic experiences can and will haunt the lives of individuals for many years to come; much in the same way that Whisper, the man without a shadow, continues to inflict harm upon those who crossed him in the past.

“The Burning Nun” (Legends of the Dark Knight # 8, June 1990) exemplifies how a secret from the past can constantly reappear, albeit subconsciously. Surrounded by scandals Mr. Winchester was fired from the school. Years later, when Bruce Wayne tries to find out what happened, he has to face the reluctance of the new headmaster to address “certain old wounds”. However, after making a generous donation to the school, Bruce acquires enough information to successfully deduce that Mr. Winchester comes from Austria. 

After traveling to Europe, Batman visits the drowned monastery of Lake Dess. And experiences real fear for the first time in years. He also uncovers the secret history of Winchester, AKA Whisper, the man without a shadow; his real name was Manfred, and he was a monk 300 hundred years ago: “he became captivated by a certain novitiate -- a strange, melancholy youth named Conrad. In the boy Manfred recognized something of his own nature perhaps [···] the youth, it seemed, had been corrupted by the heretical belief that sin is the road to salvation”, seduced by the endless possibilities of sin, Manfred makes a pact with the Devil and he is granted three centuries of immortality.

the inverted sign / el signo invertido

In “The Hangman’s Tale” (Legends of the Dark Knight # 9, July 1990), Batman begins to understand Whisper’s plans “Dreams. Ghosts. Murdered children”, and architecture. Somehow everything is connected to Gotham's Cathedral. In a conversation with Alfred, Bruce remember when his father, Thomas Wayne, met Mr. Winchester and realized what kind of monster he was, immediately taking Bruce home. Twenty years later Whisper admits that he would have killed Bruce if he had remained at the school. He would've been his 8th victim. Surprised to see his old pupil again, Whisper mocks Batman by saying “you are still little more than a brutalized child for whom the world is all shadows and fear”. Here, Janson’s style fits perfectly the somber narrative proposed by Morrison: there are many heavy lines, brusque even; and ink stains that resemble blood but also fill in the atmosphere with a much needed sense of dread. 

“Walpurgisnacht” (Legends of the Dark Knight # 10, August  1990) marks the final confrontation between Whisper and the Dark Knight. How can one normal human being defeat an immortal creature? Batman knows that mere muscles are useless against Whisper, he must use all his intelligence and resources to outsmart him and stop the arcane ritual he is conducting in the cathedral. Morrison’s “Gothic” is shocking, fascinating and extremely dark… it’s no surprise that even today, after 27 years, it’s still considered one of the greatest Batman stories ever published.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________

Después del rotundo éxito de “Arkham Asylum”, Grant Morrison regresaría a Batman en “Gothic”, descrito como un “romance en cinco volúmenes”. El primer capítulo, “El hombre sin sombra” (publicado en Legends of the Dark Knight # 6, abril de 1990), presenta a un nuevo antagonista, a la vez que se centra en el lado más desagradable de la ciudad de Batman: “La ciudad de Gotham es el infierno. Todos estamos en el infierno. Y yo soy el rey del infierno", grita un enojado Batman. Estas no son palabras vacías. Ciertamente, a juzgar por las ilustraciones casi infernales inventadas por la efervescente imaginación de Klaus Janson, tendríamos que creer que cada palabra pronunciada por el cruzado enmascarado es absolutamente cierta.

Bruce Wayne remembers the past / Bruce Wayne recuerda el pasado

En estas páginas, el escritor escocés sorprende al lector con momentos de aguda caracterización y genuino desarrollo de personajes. Las secuencias más inolvidables ocurren, por ejemplo, durante las conversaciones entre Bruce Wayne y su mayordomo, Alfred Pennyworth. Bruce permanece inmóvil, rodeado de relojes que se han detenido exactamente a la misma hora, la hora de la muerte de su padre; y cuando es interrumpido por Alfred parece estar mucho más preocupado y tenso que de costumbre. También estamos al tanto de las pesadillas de Bruce (o “terrores diurnos” como los llama Alfred), en las que ve a su padre, todavía vivo, pero horriblemente desfigurado, sin boca e incapaz de hablar con su hijo. 

Para Bruce Wayne, convertirse en Batman es la única alternativa para silenciar el horror que se esconde en su subconsciente. Sin embargo, nunca antes se ha enfrentado con un enemigo como Whisper. Este antagonista comparte pocas semejanzas con los habituales villanos coloridos que Batman derrota a diario. Este hombre misterioso y siniestro está cazando a sus antiguos colegas y ejecutándolos de la manera más dolorosa que puede imaginar.

Parece que Whisper es completamente psicótico, y al mismo tiempo es más peligroso que cualquier otro villano de Batman. Está haciendo un trabajo tan ejemplar al eliminar a sus antiguos colegas que las familias mafiosas de Gotham se ven obligadas a pedir ayuda al propio Caballero Oscuro. Janson sobresale en una página que muestra el cielo de Gotham y la señal de murciélago improvisada (e invertida) de los mafiosos. Uno de los criminales explica lo que sucedió: “Hace veinte años lo matamos. Tuvimos que matarlo antes de que lo hiciera nuevamente [...] Lo matamos y no se queda muerto”. Whisper es verdaderamente el hombre sin sombra.

Alfred & Batman

En “El barco de la muerte” (Legends of the Dark Knight # 7, mayo de 1990) vemos a Bruce Wayne como un individuo vulnerable, plagado de pesadillas recurrentes que le recuerdan a sus padres muertos y su traumático pasado. Ni siquiera los recuerdos de su infancia son reconfortantes, sino que representan otro paisaje para el pánico.

Alfred no puede calmar a Bruce después de que despierta gritando. Las cicatrices del pasado no pueden ser curadas tan fácilmente. Bruce comparte con Alfred una confesión acerca de sus días como estudiante en una escuela privada: “era tradicional vivir con miedo de los prefectos abusadores. Era tradicional ser golpeado y humillado y luchar contra los intentos de seducción de profesores viejos y degenerados con grados doctorales”.

Tal vez uno de los recuerdos más impactantes es aquel que muestra a Bruce Wayne siendo golpeado violentamente por Winchester, el director de la escuela. Esta escena en particular, que describe el abuso infantil de una manera muy explícita, es un punto fundamental de la narrativa, ya que muestra que las experiencias traumáticas pueden perseguir, y perseguirán, a los individuos durante muchos años; de la misma manera que Whisper, el hombre sin sombra, continúa infligiendo daño a aquellos que intentaron detenerlo en el pasado.

More victims / más víctimas

“La monja en llamas” (Legends of the Dark Knight # 8, junio de 1990) ejemplifica cómo un secreto del pasado puede reaparecer constantemente, aunque inconscientemente. Rodeado de escándalos, el Sr. Winchester fue despedido de la escuela. Años más tarde, cuando Bruce Wayne trata de averiguar lo que sucedió, tiene que enfrentarse a la renuencia del nuevo director para abordar “ciertas viejas heridas”. Sin embargo, después de hacer una generosa donación a la escuela, Bruce adquiere suficiente información para deducir con éxito que el Sr. Winchester proviene de Austria.

Después de viajar a Europa, Batman visita el monasterio inundado del lago Dess. Y experimenta miedo de verdad por primera vez en años. También descubre la historia secreta de Winchester, alias Whisper, el hombre sin sombra; su verdadero nombre era Manfred, y fue un monje hace 300 años: “él se dejó cautivar por cierto novicio - un jovencito extraño y melancólico llamado Conrad. En el muchacho, Manfred tal vez reconoció algo de su propia naturaleza [···] el joven, al parecer, había sido corrompido por la creencia herética de que el pecado es el camino a la salvación”, seducido por las infinitas posibilidades del pecado, Manfred hace un pacto con el Diablo y se le conceden tres siglos de inmortalidad.

The final trap / la trampa final

En “El relato del ahorcado” (Legends of the Dark Knight # 9, julio de 1990), Batman comienza a entender los planes de Whisper “Sueños. Fantasmas. Niños asesinados”, y la arquitectura. De alguna manera todo está conectado a la Catedral de Ciudad Gótica. En una conversación con Alfred, Bruce recuerda cuando su padre, Thomas Wayne, se reunió con el Sr. Winchester y constató qué clase de monstruo era, sacó a Bruce de ese colegio. Veinte años después Whisper admite que habría matado a Bruce si hubiera permanecido en la escuela. Habría sido su octava víctima. Sorprendido al ver a su antiguo alumno de nuevo, Whisper se burla de Batman diciéndole “todavía eres poco más que un niño maltratado para quien el mundo no es sino sombras y miedo”. Aquí, el estilo de Janson encaja perfectamente con la sombría narración propuesta por Morrison: hay muchas líneas pesadas, incluso bruscas; y manchas de tinta que se asemejan a la sangre, pero que también llenan la atmósfera con una apremiante sensación de miedo.

"Walpurgisnacht" (Legends of the Dark Knight # 10, agosto de 1990) marca la confrontación final entre Whisper y el Caballero Oscuro. ¿Cómo puede un ser humano normal derrotar a una criatura inmortal? Batman sabe que los músculos son inútiles contra Whisper, debe usar toda su inteligencia y sus recursos para ser más astuto que su contrincante y así detener el ritual arcano que está llevando a cabo en la catedral. “Gothic” de Morrison es sorprendente, fascinante y extremadamente oscura... no es ninguna sorpresa que aún hoy, después de 27 años, todavía sea considerada una de las mejores historias de Batman.

Sidekick # 4, 5 & 6 - J M Straczynski & Tom Mandrake

When I read the first issue of Sidekick I knew I had found exactly the kind of series I was looking for. It was a much needed incursion into the sidekick culture –an interesting, cruel and bold analysis of the figure of the teenager assistant of an adult hero– and Straczynski combined humor, sexuality and power in one sweeping narrative.

What else can I say? I’ve always felt fascinated with the ambiguous nature of those young heroes that live with mature men. Is it a relationship based purely on admiration? Or is it something else, something akin to the ties between the erastês (ἐραστής) and the erômenos (ἐρώμενος) from Ancient Greece? These are relevant questions, and although Sidekick is an audacious title I’m afraid they will be left unanswered.

Certainly, at the beginning I thought Sidekick would be reminiscent of radical titles such as Rick Veitch’s "Brat Pack" (a cruel and ironic story about a Robin-like teenager who is traumatized after living with a sexually depraved Batman-like character), it seems to me now that J M Straczynski is shying away from the most controversial subject: “Sidekick is the tale of a declining sidekick on the downward slide into madness”, and not the tale, I might add, of sexual innuendo, perversion and abuse that might have scandalized most –if not all– readers. 

In issues 4 through 6, we discover more about Julia Moonglow’s dark past and her rather sinister plans regarding Flyboy’s future. She has been responsible for discrediting him and ruining his reputation, but at the same time, by pushing the kid over the edge she has awaken something in him, something disturbing, ferocious and terrifying.

The initial mystery of Red Cowl’s disappearance is explored further. Soon, it becomes obvious for Barry that his beloved mentor was the world’s greatest liar. He isn’t dead, he faked his own demise so he could enjoy an hedonistic lifestyle without worrying for the consequences of his actions. Finding out the truth is a painful blow to Barry. He has been abandoned, he has been humiliated, he has been insulted and rejected by every citizen in Sol City, but only now he is hitting rock bottom.

So in many ways this is a saga about redemption and revenge, all mixed up in one furious journey. Personally, I think it’s interesting to observe how Flyboy starts killing superheroes, completely forgetting his past as one of the good guys. Sure, some of you might say that this ‘good guy turned into bad guy’ premise isn’t terribly original, but I think JMS handles it with literary aplomb.

Of course, Sidekick wouldn’t be so impressive without the art of Tom Mandrake. I’ve been a fan of Mandrake for years. Surely many fans consider him famous for his runs in “Martian Manhunter” and “Night Force”, nevertheless the first time I saw his amazing work was in the pages of “Arion, Lord of Atlantis”, one of my favorite DC titles from the 80s. As you can see, it’s no coincidence that my nom de plume is Arion. Like I told Straczynski, Tom Mandrake was more than enough incentive for me to pick up this new series. By the way, in case you missed my letter –published in issue 3 and answered by Straczynski himself– simply click here to read it.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________

Flyboy remembers the past / Flyboy recuerda el pasado

Julia Moonglow & Flyboy 

Cuando leí el primer número de “Sidekick”, supe que había encontrado exactamente el tipo de colección que estaba buscando. Era una muy necesaria incursión en la cultura de los aliados juveniles –un análisis interesante, cruel y atrevido de la figura del ayudante adolescente y el héroe adulto– y Straczynski combinaba humor, sexualidad y poder en una atrayente narrativa.

¿Qué más puedo decir? Siempre me he sentido fascinado por la naturaleza ambigua de estos jóvenes héroes que viven con hombres maduros. ¿Es una relación basada puramente en la admiración? ¿O es algo más, algo similar a los vínculos entre el erastês (ἐραστής) y el erômenos (ἐρώμενος) de la Antigua Grecia? Estas son preguntas relevantes, y aunque "Sidekick" es una serie audaz me temo que no serán respondidas. 

Ciertamente, al inicio pensé que "Sidekick" me haría recordar títulos radicales como  "Brat Pack" de Rick Veitch (una cruel e irónica historia sobre un adolescente parecido a Robin que termina traumatizado después de vivir con un personaje sexualmente depravado parecido a Batman), ahora me parece que J M Straczynski está huyendo de estos temas controversiales: “Sidekick es el relato de un ayudante juvenil que desciende hacia la locura”, y no el relato, podría añadir, de insinuación sexual, perversión y abuso que podría haber escandalizado a muchos lectores, o a todos ellos.

The killing begins / la matanza comienza

En los números 4 a 6, descubrimos más sobre el pasado oscuro de Julia Moonglow y sus planes bastantes siniestros en relación al futuro de Flyboy. Ella ha sido la responsable de desacreditarlo y arruinar su reputación, pero al mismo tiempo, al empujar al muchacho hasta el borde del abismo, ha despertado algo en él, algo perturbador, feroz y terrorífico.

El misterio inicial de la desaparición de Red Cowl es explorado aún más. Pronto, para Barry resulta obvio que su dichoso mentor era el mayor mentiroso del mundo. No está muerto, fingió su propia muerte para poder disfrutar de un estilo de vida hedonista sin preocuparse por las consecuencias de sus actos. Descubrir la verdad es un doloroso golpe para Barry. Ha sido abandonado, humillado, insultado y rechazado por todos los ciudadanos de Sol City, pero sólo ahora cae hasta el fondo. 

Así que de muchas maneras esta es una saga sobre redención y venganza, todo mezclado en una furiosa travesía. Personalmente, creo que es interesante observar cómo Flyboy empieza a matar superhéroes, olvidando completamente su pasado como uno de los chicos buenos. Seguro, algunos podrían decir que esta premisa de 'bueno que se convierte en malo' no es terriblemente original, pero creo que JMS la maneja con aplomo literario. 

Por supuesto, “Sidekick” no sería tan impresionante sin el arte de Tom Mandrake. He sido fan de Mandrake por años. Seguramente será famoso para muchos fans por sus etapas en “Martian Manhunter” y “Night Force”, no obstante, la primera vez que vi su asombroso trabajo fue en las páginas de “Arion, Lord of Atlantis”, una de mis colecciones favoritas de DC de los 80s. Como pueden ver, no es ninguna coincidencia que mi nom de plume sea Arion. Como le dije a Straczynski, Tom Mandrake fue un incentivo más que suficiente para hacerme comprar esta miniserie. Por cierto, en caso de que se hayan perdido mi carta –publicada en el número 3 y respondida por el propio Straczynski– simplemente hagan click aquí para leerla.

Caligula # 4 - German Nobile

Dying of old age was a rare privilege for more than a few Roman emperors… Not only the ambitions of other men to seize power was a factor in the constant plots within the Empire, but also the strange nature of some of the rulers of Rome. Caligula was assassinated mainly because of his eccentricities, because he was deemed as a dangerous and demented man that would ruin Rome forever.

But this isn’t History 101, this is David Lapham’s Caligula. After a failed assassination attempt, the Emperor decides to test everyone’s loyalties. And that’s how he designs a depraved game. He’s clearly the embodiment of power (in real life he was the most powerful man and in Lapham’s comic book, he also has supernatural abilities which make him even more powerful). He can only relate to others by overpowering them. And as Michel Foucault explains, power relations are the essence of society, and this is especially true for sexuality. Power relations are formed in all relations where differences exist.

What Foucault means by power is not necessarily what is ordinarily understood: it is something ubiquitous and cannot be thought of as dual, as creating a division between those dominating and those being dominated. This explains why Felix (the boy formerly known as Junius) is Caligula’s equal and his slave simultaneously. 

Do we understand power as something negative, oppressing? Something that defines what is not to be done? The senators and noble men that surround Caligula endorse the negative connotation of power. But for Caligula this game is focused on something else… rather than prohibiting something –and he has the power to do so- he wants to hear them confess. Common power relations related to sexuality also pertain to the one who confesses and the one that receives the confession.

Everyone follows Caligula’s orders. They are forced to have sex with the men or women Caligula chooses. They eat one of their own when he’s still alive. And throughout this ‘game’ Caligula forces them to confess. And they do. All of them do, but only a handful survive the evening.

I’m a fan of Avatar Press and I’m a fan of the prodigious artist German Nobile, who keeps surprising me, panel after panel. Lapham and Nobile are the ideal creative team. I can’t wait to read the last two issues of the miniseries.

Caligula # 1: http://artbyarion.blogspot.com/2011/05/caligula-by-lapham-nobile.html
Caligula # 2: http://artbyarion.blogspot.com/2011/07/caligula-david-lapham-german-nobile.html
Caligula # 3: http://artbyarion.blogspot.com/2011/09/caligula-3-by-david-lapham.html
___________________________________________________________________________________

Pocos emperadores tuvieron el privilegio de llegar a viejos... no sólo por las ambiciones de otros hombres para llegar al poder, sino por la extraña naturaleza de algunos de los gobernantes de Roma. Calígula fue asesinado principalmente por sus excentricidades, porque era considerado como un hombre demente y peligroso que arruinaría a Roma para siempre.

Pero esto no es una clase de historia, esto es el Calígula de David Lapham. Luego de un intento de homicidio, el emperador decide poner a prueba la lealtad de todos. Y así es como diseña un juego depravado. Claramente, él representa el poder (en la vida real fue el hombre más poderoso y en el cómic de Lapham tiene incluso habilidades sobrenaturales). La única forma en la que puede vincularse con otros es ejerciendo su poder. Y como Michel Foucault explica, las relaciones de poder son la esencia de la sociedad, y esto es especialmente cierto para la sexualidad. Las relaciones de poder están presentes en todas las relaciones en las que hay diferencias.

Lo que Foucault quiere decir con poder no es lo que comúnmente entendemos: es algo ubicuo y no puede pensarse de manera dual, creando una división entre aquellos que dominan y aquellos que son dominados. Esto explica por qué Félix (el muchacho conocido antes como Junius) está al mismo nivel de Calígula y, simultáneamente, es su esclavo.

¿Entendemos el poder como algo negativo, opresivo? ¿Algo que define lo que no debemos hacer? Los senadores y patricios romanos que rodean Calígula se adscriben a esta connotación negativa del poder. Pero para Calígula este juego no está enfocado en la prohibición, lo que él quiere es que se confiesen. Las relaciones comunes de poder, relacionadas a la sexualidad, involucran siempre a alguien que se confiesa y a alguien que escucha esta confesión.

Todos siguen las órdenes de Calígula. Son obligados a tener sexo con los hombres o mujeres que Calígula elige. Devoran a uno de los suyos cuando todavía está vivo. Y a lo largo de este 'juego', Calígula los obliga a confesar. Y así lo hacen. Todos confiesan, aunque sólo un puñado sobrevive a la velada.

Soy un fan de Avatar Press y un fan del prodigioso artista German Nobile, que me sorprende con cada viñeta. Lapham y Nobile son el equipo creativo ideal. No puedo esperar a leer los últimos dos números de la miniserie.

Caligula # 1: http://artbyarion.blogspot.com/2011/05/caligula-by-lapham-nobile.html
Caligula # 2: http://artbyarion.blogspot.com/2011/07/caligula-david-lapham-german-nobile.html
Caligula # 3: http://artbyarion.blogspot.com/2011/09/caligula-3-by-david-lapham.html

Mysterious Skin (2004)

Directed by Gregg Araki

It all starts and ends with a little league’s pedophile coach and two kids: Neil and Brian, who unbeknownst to their parents are the victims of a sexual predator. But what is the authentic aftermath of this encounter between the man and the 8-year-old children?The repercussions of sexual abuse will affect greatly the lives of Neil and Brian, but in so many different ways that one could almost wonder if they shared the same experience. As a matter of fact, being sexually abused is such a traumatic event for Brian that he blocks it out of his mind unable to cope with the real, and he then proceeds to fill in the memory gaps with a fantasy of alien abduction. Recurring to such self-defense mechanisms is quite a normal psychological strategy, but it also mingles well with a recurring theme in Araki’s cinematography.

Neil, on the other hand, fills in the gashing void with an idealized image of the pedophile. After all, during an entire summer the two of them spend many nights together. Neil actually functions as an accomplice, helping the coach to lure in unsuspecting boys, thus creating a perverse bond between them. Perhaps one of the greatest accomplishes of the novel is to invert the roles, creating a pedophile that seems to be nicer and more caring than the boys’ parents, while at the same time embedding at least one of the victims with an attitude that one would find difficult to sympathize with. Araki’s film, of course, thrives because of that: the complexity between the characters relationships. This is not, after all, a lesson of morality. Here the coach leaves the town, with an untarnished reputation, and leaves behind Neil, a very obsessed boy who admits later that “it's a huge part of me. No one ever made me feel that way before or since [...] I was his one true love”.

Perversion seems to be the one predominant constant throughout Neil’s life, but as Lacan would define it, a perverse individual is the one who assumes the position of the object-instrument of the "will-to-enjoy" (volonté-de-jouissance), which is not his own will but that of the big Other. In this case, Neil accepts to serve as a garish tool of pleasure for the coach, and years later, as a teenage hustler, he has no quandaries when it is his turn to be the instrument of joy of the other (namely his clients). Emotionally detached from everyone, only a girl, a friend from childhood, remains as his one and true humane anchor. His mother, after all, has always been a carefree woman, constantly hooking up with men, and paying no attention to his son; that’s why when Neil is about to depart to New York, she looks at him and utters “my baby, all grown up”, not as a typical motherly affirmation but rather a discovery: time flew by, and she wasn’t there at all.

Brian’s dreams are a reminder that another boy was with him the night of the alien abduction, consequently the insecure boy starts the search for Neil, and learns of his whereabouts just after Neil has left for the big city. It is then that Neil’s friend, Eric, a very flamboyant gay kid, befriends him. Brian is quite a timid and introversive teenager, perhaps as a result of having a very dominant mother and an absent father (even before he abandons the family, he was only there to state how disappointed he was at his son). Eric describes him as "weirdly asexual" (even without knowing how Brian had violently rejected a UFO obsessed woman that intended to caress his penis); indeed, Brian is unable to reclaim sexuality for himself, and after having always lived in a world of his own he finds in Eric’s friendship everything he needs to break out of his shelf.

As a male prostitute, Neil finds the horror of the real in New York, and he will soon realize how dangerous his line of business can get. Back in town, Eric is preparing himself to let go of the one reality that has sustained and nurtured his psyche, but can he embrace the real if Neil tells him exactly what happened that fatidic night?  

Araki brilliantly depicts this honest, heart-wrenching and unruly story, taking advantage of the exceptional acting qualities of Joseph Gordon-Levitt (Neil), a daring and talented actor that has worked in many interesting independent films, such as Brick, The Lookout or Latter Days (a gay themed movie). This actor finds in Brady Corbet (Brian) the ideal partner; Corbet creates a subtle but fascinating character, completely different from his roles in Funny Games US or Thirteen, proving not only that he is a great actor but that he also knows how to choose the best directors to work with.

And that's why Mysterious Skin makes it into my top 100 films. I highly recommend it.

And by the way, I'm glad to see that every month my blog gets more visits. Cheers!
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Fiel a los principios de Coherencia, mi rechazo por la candidata a la presidencia prevaleció. Ni siquiera haber perdido casi dos mil dólares en la bolsa de valores de Lima logró disuadirme. Aunque, por supuesto, como decía Fernando De Szyszlo en relación al otro candidato, a ese tampoco le creo. 

Así que decidí hacer lo único sensato, o sea contribuir con las arcas fiscales. Con la multa evito la votación, y me ahorro esa sensación horrible de tener que elegir a un mal menor (y honestamente, nunca he tenido la línea Sartriana de Mario Vargas Llosa que le permite hacer justamente eso, elegir una de las dos opciones, a pesar de todo).

Las pérdidas también me han hecho ver que algunos ajustes son necesarios, al menos por ahora. Así, por ejemplo, he cancelado mis tarjetas de crédito, todas menos una. Así que adiós a tarjetas con límites de 5000 soles (como la del BBVA que siempre me sacó de apuros) y cosas por el estilo. Para bien o para mal, este domingo ha sido elegido el próximo mandatario del país.